[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: School of Pharmacy's Deanship

Dear Everybody,
I would presume when we discuss about the Dean of a School of Pharmacy being
a Pharmacist would mean:

1. Has a first degree in Pharmacy
2. Registered with the Pharmacy Board, Council or Society  (eg RPharmS of
uK)
3. Has a professional licence to practice pharmacy.

Being in the academic field would mean the pharmacist would have
post-graduate qualifications in any aspect of pharmaceutical sciences.

What we seem to have in a number of pharmacy schools is that non-holders of
a first degree in pharmacy heads the school.

REgards
Dr Allan Mathews
BPharm; MSc; PhD; CertSM; DipM, MCIM
-----Original Message-----
From: David <david@experimental.fm.usp.br>
To: PharmCare <PharmCare@pharmweb1.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thursday, June 29, 2000 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: School of Pharmacy's Deanship


>Dear van Mil
>
>Ok. I understand your message. Can you tell me: we graduate in B.S.Pharm or
>Pharm.D after complete 5 years of pharmacy entry level graduation? Our
>course is semestral with 9 semester in integral period (8:00 am ~ 6:00 pm).
>We get a grade in Pharmacist and Biochemistry and after registration in
>Regional Pharmaceutical Council, that will give us a license to practice
>pharmacy we get a title before the name: doctor.
>In five years our course is divided in basic (3 years) and professional
core
>(2 years).
>
>Basic Core: Mathematics, Basic and Inorganic Chemistry, Introduction in
>Pharmaceutical Sciences, First Aid, Introduction in Physical Measures to
>Pharmacy, Statistics, Organic Chemistry I, Physical Chemistry VI, Inorganic
>Chemistry, Physics I, Organic Chemistry II, Experimental Organic Chemistry
>VII, Qualitative Analytical Chemistry III, Human Anatomy I, Citology
>Histology and Embriology I, Fisiology and Biophysics I, Biochemistry:
>biomolecular structure and metabolism, Experimental Biochemistry, Human
>Anatomy II, Citology Histology and Embriology II, Fisiology and biophysics
>II, Quantitative Analytical Chemistry VI, Microbiology, Parasitology,
>Immunology, Instrumental Analytical Chemistry II, Bromatology, Biochemistry
>and molecular biology, Pathology, Pharmacodinamics, Medicinal Chemistry,
>Heterocyclic Compounds, Biopharmacognosis and pharmaceutical coumpounding.
>
>Professional core is divided in 3 major area: Pharmaceuticals, Diagnostics
>and Food.
>
>Pharmaceuticals: Industrial Physics, Toxicology I, Physics II, Public
Health
>to pharmacists, Pharmaceuticals Coumpounding, Nuclear Pharmacy, Deontology
>and Law, Economy and Administration, Technology in Fermentation,
>Pharmacotherapy, Cosmetology, Industrial Pharmaceutical Coumpounding, Human
>Genetics, Industrial Enzimology II, Production Supervisor,
>Chemical-Pharmaceutical Technology, Quality Controls methods
>(physical-chemistry and microbiology), Hospitalar Pharmacy and Technology
in
>Vaccines and Serum.
>
>Diagostics: Nuclear Pharmacy, Toxicology I, Public Health, Clinical
>Immunology, Medical Chemistry, Deontology and Law, Hematology, Clinical
>Citology, Human Genetics, Economy and Administration, Toxicology II,
>Clinical Microbiology, Quality Control in Medical Diagnosis (Pathology),
>Micology and Parasitology and Pharmaceutical Coumpounding.
>
>Food: Toxicology I, Industrial Physics, Technology in Vaccines and Serum,
>Public Health, Physics II, Nuclear Pharmacy, Deontology and Law,
>Microbiological Analysis in Food, Fermentation Technology in Food, Food
>Analysis, Food Chemistry and Biochemistry, Human Genetics, Industrial
>Enzimology II, Food Government Control, Technology in Food, Quality Control
>in Food, Human Nutrition and Fish.
>
>So, I'm confusing about our trends in Pharmaceutical Education in my
>country.
>
>David I Kasahara
>
>
>-----Mensagem original-----
>De: J.W.F. van Mil <jwfvmil@wxs.nl>
>Para: PharmCare <PharmCare@pharmweb1.man.ac.uk>
>Data: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:07 PM
>Assunto: Re: School of Pharmacy's Deanship
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>It seems like we have much more differentiation than we
>>anticipated between countries..
>>
>>To answer david from Sao Paulo: in some countries the a
>>pharmacist is someone who completed a pharmaceutical
>>education at university, and additionally did an exam for a
>>pharmacist license. So basically any pharmacist is then a
>>pharmaceutical scientist (having a masters, or equivalent in
>>pharmacy). But not every pharmaceutical scientist is a pharmacist,
>>because they still need to acquire a license (or pharmacist
>>diplome)..
>>
>>Now, whether universities prepare their students as a
>>pharmaceutical scientist is another story, and depends very much
>>on the quality and length of the university education. In some
>>countries the schools of pharmacy have their curriculum totally
>>oriented towards 'producing' pharmacists. In other countries there
>>might be a differentiation in the university education, one leading to
>>a pharmaceutical scientist and the other towards being a
>>pharmacist, depending on the topics chosen during the curriculum..
>>
>>Lastly, the length of the education does not tell you very much
>>about the qualification. This depends also on the entry level, with
>>which the students enter university. In some countries students get
>>into university at 16, after an average secondary school system, in
>>other they enter when they are 19 or 20 after having gone through
>>an additional college..
>>
>>
>>Foppe
>>
>>>    Hi
>>>
>>>    What is difference between pharmacist and pharmaceutical scientist? In
>>>    my country, precisally in my State, we have near 10 schools of
>>>    pharmacy, 3 is public and other schools are private. All public
>>>    pharmacy school have a dean that is graduate in pharmaceutical Science
>>>    and had an Ph.D. in any area and have successfully completed their
>>>    "livre-docência" in pharmacy. And so, after become an full professor,
>>>    he is elegible to become a dean in any public pharmacy School..
>>>
>>>    David I Kasahara, B.S.Pharm..
>>>    MSc Student at School of Medicine - University of Sao Paulo
>>>
>>>    -----Mensagem original-----
>>>    De: Billy Futter <B.Futter@ru.ac.za>
>>>    Para: PharmCare <PharmCare@pharmweb1.man.ac.uk>
>>>    Data: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 8:13 AM
>>>    Assunto: Re: School of Pharmacy's Deanship
>>>
>>>
>>>    >Hi Dzul
>>>    >We have 9 universities offering partial of complete training for
>>>    >entry level pharmacist courses, nearly all of whom have a background
>>>    >in pharmaceutics.  A few have changed emphasis towards pharmacy
>>>    >practice, or drug policy.  With the emphasis in the is moving away
>>>    >manufacturing towards more clinical competencies, it is interesting
>>>    >to speculate on the role played by the key discipline of the head in
>>>    >resisting or facilitating this change...
>>>    >
>>>    >It is also interesting to consider the role that a non-pharmacist
>>>    >might play in facilitating or resisting this change.  Would it be
>>>    >fair to say that if the head was from the pure sciences, that there
>>>    >would be a greater propensity to hang onto traditional competencies?
>>>    >(PS I am a social scientist so I am more interested in putting the
>>>    >care into pharmaceutical care than the pharmaceuticals!)
>>>    >
>>>    >Cheers
>>>    >Billy
>>>    >
>>>    >Billy Futter
>>>    >Associate Professor
>>>    >Faculty of Pharmacy
>>>    >Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
>>>    >email B.Futter@ru.ac.za
>>>    >phone 046 603 8494
>>>    >fax  046 636 1205
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>    >
>>>
>>
>>
>>*****************************************************************
>>    Foppe van Mil, PhD, Pharm D. Pharmacy practice consultant
>>     Margrietlaan 1, NL 9471 CT Zuidlaren, The Netherlands
>>Tel: +31 50 4094333. Fax +31 50 4090732. Email: jwfvmil@wxs.nl
>>*****************************************************************
>>    Attachments may arrive after this message as separate mail
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index